Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
Post image 5
Post image 6
Post image 7
Post image 8
Post image 9
Post image 10
Post image 11
Post image 12
Post image 13
Post image 14
Post image 15
Post image 16
Post image 17
Post image 18
Post image 19
Post image 20
Post image 21
Post image 22
Post image 23
Post image 24
Post image 25
Post image 26
Post image 27
Post image 28
Post image 29
Post image 30
1 / 30
0

Pondering Swatch’s Relevance: Is Adrenaline-Fueled Hype Enough To Remain A Player In The Watch Game?

Fratello Watches – The Magazine Dedicated To Luxury Watches·Lex Stolk·3 days ago
#irzVel8b
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Hype around Swatch is not new. The “Second Watch,” launched in 1983 as a fun and affordable accessory you could wear to match your daily outfits, was never meant to be a lifelong heirloom investment. It was always about the heat of the moment. The colorful plastic Swatch caused a massive cultural and commercial “uproar” in the ‘80s and ‘90s, albeit in a very positive way. The brand triggered a global frenzy, with shoppers fiercely competing to buy the latest versions. Swatch was also always collaborating with artists like Keith Haring (1986) and fashion designer Vivienne Westwood (1992–1993), for instance. When Swatch collaborated with Omega to create the MoonSwatch, everything changed. And now, a few years after the Blancpain × Swatch Bioceramic Scuba Fifty Fathoms and right after the launch of the Audemars Piguet × Swatch Royal Pop, I can’t help but start pondering Swatch’s relevance. What’s the difference between working with an artist and another watch brand? The answer is obvious.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More