Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
Post image 5
Post image 6
Post image 7
Post image 8
Post image 9
1 / 9
0

The Art Market Post-Pollock

Hyperallergic·Marc J. Straus·3 days ago
#fdvCyPAH
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Opinion After spring's marquee auctions, we are led to believe that everything in our important art universe is doing just fine. It isn't. May 29, 2026 — 5 min read Auctioneer Adrien Meyer sells Jackson Pollock’s "Number 7A" (1948) at Christie's for $181.2 million (photo courtesy Christie's) The Pollock sucks up the oxygen. It is the lead story — important, yes, but also misleading. $181.2 million for a great Pollock , wisely held back until the market could carry it. More astonishing, in some ways, than the $451 million Leonardo, which had its own issues and was painted several centuries ago. This Pollock was made in my lifetime. Not just the Pollock, but a $107.6 million Brancusi. Much of Christie’s evening sale went smoothly, exuberant and beautifully orchestrated.  But not so fast. For in this $1.1 billion evening sale, the number of artworks that hammered below low estimate or went unsold was substantial, roughly 30%, including big-ticket items like Agnes Gund’s Twombly .…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More