Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
Post image 5
Post image 6
Post image 7
1 / 7
0

I Rewrote a Real Data Workflow in Polars. Pandas Didn’t Stand a Chance. | Towards Data Science

Towards Data Science·Ibrahim Salami·26 days ago
#KMunxC7w
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

— I wasn’t actively looking for Polars. I’ve been on a bit of a Pandas optimization journey lately. First, I wrote about why you should stop writing loops in Pandas and think in columns instead. Then I went deeper to profiling real workflows, fixing vectorization mistakes, and ended up cutting a 61-second pipeline down to 0.33 seconds using nothing but better Pandas and NumPy. That one surprised even me. So I was in a good place with Pandas. I felt like I finally understood how to use it properly. Then someone dropped a comment on one of my posts. Something along the lines of: “Have you tried Polars? It’s built for exactly this kind of thing.” I’d seen the name floating around in the data community. There was buzz around it — something about speed, about a completely different way of thinking about data pipelines. But I’d never actually touched it. That comment was enough to push me over the edge. So I did what I always do.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More