John Roberts has spent years whining about how totally unfair it is that people claim he and his colleagues rule based on partisan leanings. He did it in 2014. He did it in 2017. He did it in 2019.…
Hypothetical for the con law scholars: Suppose a Dem trifecta drew all of the country's congressional districts to be partisan gerrymanders, granting them permanent control of the House. Would the current conservative Supreme Court strike it down, and if so, under what basis?
From Reddit - r/supremecourt: Hypothetical for the con law scholars: Suppose a Dem trifecta drew all of the country's congressional districts to be partisan gerrymanders, granting them permanent control of the House.…
The Voting Rights Act has been near death since 2013, and Wednesday the Supreme Court administered the coup de grâce. In a 6-3 decision written by Justice Samuel Alito, the […]
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision not to take on partisan gerrymandering, Wharton's Steven Kimbrough offers solutions for how to more fairly define the boundaries of voting districts.…Read More