Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
1 / 2
0

Cloudflare R2 vs S3 for VPS Hosting: Real-World Picks

DEV Community·Juan Diego Isaza A.·about 1 month ago
#zLBNJCtK
#cloud#aws#cloudflare#vps#egress#storage
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

If you’re deciding cloudflare r2 vs s3 , the “best” answer depends less on raw durability marketing and more on your VPS hosting pattern: egress-heavy content, multi-region needs, API compatibility, and how much operational complexity you can tolerate. 1) The non-obvious difference: egress economics The headline most people know: Cloudflare R2 doesn’t charge egress fees (to the public internet). S3 does (unless you’re staying inside AWS or using specific optimizations). For VPS hosting, this is a big deal because your compute is typically not inside AWS. Here’s the practical implication: If your VPS serves lots of bytes (images, downloads, video snippets, backups you restore often), S3 egress can dominate your bill. If your traffic stays in AWS , S3 can be cost-efficient and operationally clean. If your stack is “VPS + CDN + object storage,” R2 often wins because the CDN story is straightforward when you already use Cloudflare.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More