Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
1 / 2
0

Why Debugging CI Failures Still Takes Longer Than Writing the Code

DEV Community·Nijat·19 days ago
#xM63EgRX
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

The Real Cost of a Red Pipeline When a CI build fails, the build itself isn't the problem. The investigation that follows is. Recent industry surveys indicate that development teams spend an average of 25–30% of their time dealing with CI/CD issues. Research from Atlassian found that failed CI builds on the main branch wasted an average of 120 hours of build time per project per year across their studied projects. That's three full working weeks — per project — just on failed builds. But those numbers only capture compute time. They don't capture the human cost: the developer who stops what they're doing, opens a 2,000-line log, scrolls to find the actual error, then has to figure out which specific code change caused it. Manual Triage Is Still the Default A 2025 academic study examining CI/CD practices across four industrial companies found something striking: the dominant approach to resolving CI failures is still manual.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More