The Free Software Foundation's Licensing and Compliance Manager published a blog post this week to explicitly state that" Responsible AI" Licenses (RAIL) are nonfree and unethical . The licenses restrict AI and ML software "from being used in a specific list of harmful applications," according to the license's web site , "e.g. in surveillance and crime prediction." (The license's steering committee is volunteers from multiple academic institutions.) But even though Responsible AI licenses are marketed as addressing ethical challenges, the FSF argues "they do not require anything that is really necessary for users to control their computing done with machine learning, including: complete training inputs, training configuration settings, trained model, or — last, but not least — the source code of software used for training, testing, and running tools based on machine learning." Thus, RAILed machine learning can be, and most probably will be, unethical.…