Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
1 / 3
0

Investment is key to the renationalisation debate | Letters

the Guardian·Guardian Staff·21 days ago
#sFLB6WqZ
#x3c#x3e#navigation#maincontent#img#british
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

If Julian Coman is old enough to remember the privatisation of British Gas ( Reversing Thatcher’s failed legacy of privatisation can be a Labour vote-winner. If you see Keir, tell him, 5 May ), he’ll surely also remember the running national joke that was British Rail, or the six-month wait to have a landline installed by the publicly owned British Telecom. His “private ownership bad, public ownership good” analysis overlooks the key point that, under either ownership model, what matters is the level of investment in the service. Pressure on regulators by successive governments to suppress investment allowances in the interests of keeping down utility bills has dwarfed the behaviours of some owners as factors in determining service levels. To argue that renationalisation will deliver substantial improvements requires one also to identify where in its over-stretched budgets the government will find the billions of pounds of extra investment on top of those currently being provided by private investors.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More