Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
1 / 3
0

The Coupling Problem Hiding in Every Go Microservice Codebase

DEV Community·Gabriel Anhaia·about 1 month ago
#rWDwwy3m
#symptom#go#architecture#service#domain#order
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Book: Hexagonal Architecture in Go Also by me: Thinking in Go (2-book series) — Complete Guide to Go Programming + Hexagonal Architecture in Go My project: Hermes IDE | GitHub — an IDE for developers who ship with Claude Code and other AI coding tools Me: xgabriel.com | GitHub You split the monolith into six services, each with its own repo and deploy pipeline. The team celebrates. Three months later, a column rename in the orders table breaks the billing service. A deploy of the inventory service requires a simultaneous deploy of the shipping service. A junior developer changes a struct in a shared Go module and triggers a cascade of failures across four services that takes the on-call engineer until 2 AM to untangle. You built microservices. You got a distributed monolith. The architecture boundary was a lie. The services share a database, import each other's types, and pass domain objects across the wire. Every coupling path that existed in the monolith still exists. You just added network latency to it.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More