Caption Daniel Rutherford, Petitioner v. United States Summary When Congress declines to make a sentencing amendment retroactive—as with the change to 18 U. S. C. §924(c)—the resulting sentencing disparity cannot serve as an “extraordinary and compelling” reason that warrants a sentence reduction under §3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Author Justice Amy Coney Barrett Opinion http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-820_97be.pdf Certiorari Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 5, 2025) Case Link 24-820 submitted by /u/scotus-bot [link] [comments]