like if humans evolved gradually from earlier primates, there couldn't have been a single generation where a non-human suddenly gave birth to a human, right? so where do scientists/philosophers draw the line? also if evolution never stops then there must be something above it? like another category could be born and another thing: biologically humans are still humans. but socially when someone behaves in a violent way or like "primitive" way then it would be called as inhuman or he/she is acting like an animal. so is being human more about biology or behaviour/morality? basically is "human" a scientific category or just a label we created for a blurry transition? submitted by /u/chronic-_hustler [link] [comments]