I'm confused: Like if David Allen made such a structured system without any cracks why would he leave the NA and project linkage disabled intentionally. Well paper based systems might be a remote reason maybe but still. Didn't he feel the need to link it. I have a few workarounds for this. I need guidance on how I should implement this and WHY? WHAT CORE REASON IS THERE? I'm using a digital system. GTD friendly Keep a list of 60 projects or so. This is my bottleneck for projects. Move all extras into someday/maybe list. This is great for occasionally keeping your priorities straight so that you can say no as things that come up. My goals are clear my purpose is clear. And I'm focused rather than managing multiple things. And once a week I check up on my project for pruning. So I'm always clear. I'll increase the number 60. but as and when I'm adaptable to the system. Star a project which is focus for the week. And do quick check to see whether it's empty.…