Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
Post image 5
Post image 6
Post image 7
Post image 8
Post image 9
Post image 10
Post image 11
Post image 12
Post image 13
Post image 14
Post image 15
Post image 16
Post image 17
Post image 18
Post image 19
Post image 20
Post image 21
Post image 22
Post image 23
1 / 23
0

Best Smart Smoke Detector (and Why You Still Need a Dumb One)

WIRED·Nena Farrell·about 2 months ago
#jc2uwP2W
#wired#smoke#alarms#smart#home#alarm
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Adding Wi-Fi doesn’t always turn out to be as smart as it sounds. A smart smoke detector turns out to be dumber than I thought, even with Wi-Fi added. Smart smoke detectors will let you know if a fire breaks out when you aren't home, but other than that they don't offer any extra benefits over a “dumb” model. And these devices introduce a problem: Most smart smoke detectors exclude one of two sensors to alert you about a fire. Every smart model I tested had only a photoelectric sensor, which picks up smoldering fires, while ionization sensors that pick up fast-burning fires were left behind. Ionization sensors are more likely to have nuisance alarms go off (while you're cooking, for example), but it's still a sensor you should have somewhere in your home, especially since modern building materials have shortened your window of time to escape a home fire . It's not to say smart smoke detectors are useless, since what matters most is having a working smoke detector at all.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More