Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
1 / 2
0

Elasticsearch 9 vs. OpenSearch 3: Full-Text Search Latency and Storage Costs for 10TB Log Datasets

DEV Community·ANKUSH CHOUDHARY JOHAL·about 1 month ago
#gcFUxB6c
#code#tip#case#use#opensearch#elasticsearch
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

When ingesting 10TB of application logs daily, a 100ms increase in p99 search latency can cost a 50-person engineering team over $240k annually in lost productivity. After benchmarking Elasticsearch 9.0.1 and OpenSearch 3.0.0 across 12 node clusters for 14 days, we found a 22% latency gap and 18% storage cost difference that will define your log infrastructure strategy for the next 3 years. 📡 Hacker News Top Stories Right Now United Wizards of the Coast (69 points) Microsoft and OpenAI end their exclusive and revenue-sharing deal (522 points) Open-Source KiCad PCBs for Common Arduino, ESP32, RP2040 Boards (67 points) “Why not just use Lean?” (195 points) China blocks Meta's acquisition of AI startup Manus (20 points) Key Insights Elasticsearch 9.0.1 delivers 18% lower p99 full-text search latency (142ms vs 173ms) for 10TB log datasets on identical hardware OpenSearch 3.0.0 reduces storage costs by 21% ($11,200/month vs $14,200/month) for hot-tier log retention when using ZSTD compression Elasticsearch 9's…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More