Menu

Remembering The 1984 Unix PC. Why Did It Fail So Hard? - Slashdot
πŸ“°
0

Remembering The 1984 Unix PC. Why Did It Fail So Hard? - Slashdot

tech.slashdot.orgΒ·@HashtagPLUSΒ·about 1 month ago
#gFSkfFXG
#comments#modal_box#unix#running#drive#time
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

"I love these machines ," writes long-time Slashdot reader Shayde : I was super-active in the Unix-PC Usenet groups back in the 90s... We hacked the hell out of them. They were small, sexy, and... they ran Unix! Unfortunately, they were a commercial failure. There were so many things wrong with them β€” not just stuff that broke, but the baseline configuration was nigh on worthless. I recently was able to get another machine and got it up and running (with a few hiccups). I whipped up a video showing all the cool things it can do , but also running through what went wrong and why it ultimately failed. The video shows the ancient green-on-black screen of 1984's AT&T Unix PC (with the OS running on a silicon drive emulation). The original machine had 512K of memory and a 10-megabyte hard drive described as slow, failure-prone, and noisy .…

Continue reading β€” create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More