Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
Post image 5
Post image 6
Post image 7
Post image 8
Post image 9
1 / 9
0

The Trouble With Permanent Alliances

Foreign Affairs·Naman Karl-Thomas Habtom·about 2 months ago
#csrzxB6Q
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

For the past 75 years, the United States has pursued a historically anomalous strategy toward alliances. Traditionally, alliances were forged as highly contingent, time-bound partnerships, but after World War II, the United States went about establishing permanent ones, including NATO and bilateral alliances such as those with South Korea and Thailand. This practice had some use during the Cold War, because it consolidated U.S. dominance on its side of the Iron Curtain. But after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the United States found itself bound by a set of alliances that sacrifice its adaptability and endanger its security. Temporary alliances are the more sensible norm. Throughout most of history, such partnerships were created to serve concrete diplomatic and strategic purposes.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More