Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
1 / 3
0

New York's case that Steam lootboxes are "gambling" is a free speech violation that "will have an impermissible chilling effect on protected videogame design", argue Valve

Rock Paper Shotgun Latest Articles Feed·Edwin Evans-Thirlwell·3 days ago
#ckiVFRSP
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

"People enjoy surprises", say lawyers in motion to dismiss Image credit: Valve / Rock Paper Shotgun Valve have moved to dismiss a New York attorney general lawsuit accusing them of facilitating illegal gambling by way of lootboxes on Steam, after first seeking to try it in the court of public opinion . In a memo filed this week, the company offered a largely familiar defence against the New York AG lawsuit, hinging on the idea that randomised lootbox rewards can't be defined as gambling under state law, because they are bought with virtual currency (which can be used for other purposes) and have no 'real' value as cash or property. They also position the lawsuit as an attack on free speech, while - to my eye, anyway - skirting around the claim that lootbox design and presentation can be inherently manipulative. Find the full 42 page memo here , care of Courthouse News. It uses the term "mystery box" throughout, one of many sanitised euphemisms for lootbox .…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More