Menu

Using nuclear explosives to bypass the Strait of Hormuz isn’t a novel idea for the U.S.
📰
0

Using nuclear explosives to bypass the Strait of Hormuz isn’t a novel idea for the U.S.

Fast Company·The Conversation·about 2 months ago
#bRyiV0tT
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

With the world struggling to get oil supplies moving from the Middle East, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich raised eyebrows with a social media post highlighting a radical idea: Use nuclear bombs to cut a new channel along a route that would avoid Iranian threats in the Strait of Hormuz. Gingrich’s March 15, 2026, post linked to an article that labeled itself as satire . Gingrich has not clarified whether his endorsement was serious. But he is old enough to remember when ideas like this were not only taken seriously but actually pursued by the U.S. and Soviet governments. As I discuss in my book, Deep Cut: Science, Power, and the Unbuilt Interoceanic Canal , the U.S. version of this project ended in 1977. At the time, Gingrich was launching his political career after working as a history and environmental studies professor . Instead of fighting over a 21-mile-wide bottleneck forever, we cut a new channel through friendly territory.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More