“Me doing the rewrite is pointless since my style of writing is similar to AI” Said proudly by the AI-using group member to justify why the other 3 members in the group should fix the AI riddled section they wrote. What is wrong with people? Also, I am sick of students conflating detectors as less than 100% accurate with being unethical. Yes, the TurnItIn feature flagged it. AND then I investigated. What is unethical about that? Did you not see that it only flagged sections written by one of you? And then the history in the GoogleDoc and the *actual writing itself* shows that this student produced junk writing in a linear fashion? I am sorry your group mate sucks, but don’t blame the messenger who is bending over backwards to *make it right to the group* by investigating to isolate it and then demanding a rewrite of those sections precisely so I don’t have to give all of you an F. The alternative - which I happily do for individual work - is to have it go straight to academic integrity with an F. Rant done.…