Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
1 / 2
0

Opinion: Why Redis 8 Cluster Beats Memcached 1.6 for Scalable Apps

DEV Community·ANKUSH CHOUDHARY JOHAL·28 days ago
#TjyAd3Hr
#opinion#redis#cluster#beats#memcached#client
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

After benchmarking 12 production-grade caching workloads across 3 cloud providers, Redis 8 Cluster delivered 3.2x higher throughput, 62% lower p99 latency, and zero manual sharding overhead compared to Memcached 1.6 – a result that contradicts the decade-old 'Memcached is faster for simple key-value' dogma. 📡 Hacker News Top Stories Right Now iOS 27 is adding a 'Create a Pass' button to Apple Wallet (98 points) AI Product Graveyard (59 points) Async Rust never left the MVP state (283 points) Should I Run Plain Docker Compose in Production in 2026? (147 points) Bun is being ported from Zig to Rust (615 points) Key Insights Redis 8 Cluster achieves 1.2M ops/sec per node vs Memcached 1.6’s 380k ops/sec for 1KB value workloads (benchmarked on AWS c7g.2xlarge) Redis 8 Cluster added native hash, list, and sorted set support with O(1) average time complexity, eliminating client-side aggregation overhead Redis 8 Cluster’s automatic rebalancing reduces operational costs by ~$42k/year for 10-node clusters vs…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More