Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
1 / 4
0

I Audited My AI Agents and Found That Most of Their Reasoning Wasn’t Observable

DEV Community·Nic Lydon·21 days ago
#RqVPG8sx
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

I run a personal AI platform with eight active agents, dozens of processors, and a fully self-hosted Langfuse instance. I built the observability layer myself. I shipped it a few weeks ago. Last week I ran the audit query for the first time. The agents that talk to me the most only had Langfuse-level lineage coverage for about 13% of their decisions. This is the writeup of what I found, why it happened, and the schema and code that explain it. If you run agents and you've never run this audit, you have a very good chance of finding the same gap. The Setup Quick context. The platform is called Nexus. It's a TypeScript monorepo plus a fleet of Python processors, running on a couple of mini PCs in my apartment. It ingests 26 data sources, runs 8 reasoning agents on schedules, and serves an MCP tool surface I use as my daily driver. Two layers matter for this post: The agents are reasoning entities. They read from gold-layer tables, decide things, and write proposals to inbox tables.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More