Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
1 / 2
0

Cloudflare R2 vs S3: Cost, Latency, and Fit

DEV Community·Juan Diego Isaza A.·about 1 month ago
#PJgYRoWk
#cloud#aws#vps#devops#storage#cloudflare
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

If you’re running a VPS and paying object storage bills, cloudflare r2 vs s3 is the comparison that can quietly move your margins. Both speak “S3-compatible,” both store blobs, and both can back static sites, backups, and media pipelines—but the trade-offs are very different once you factor in egress, latency, and operational friction. Pricing and the egress tax (the real differentiator) Amazon S3’s storage pricing is only half the story; the other half is getting data out . In VPS-hosting workflows (serving images, downloads, video segments, game assets), egress can dwarf storage costs. Cloudflare R2 ’s headline feature is simple: zero egress fees (when you serve through Cloudflare’s network). That changes architecture decisions: you can be less aggressive about caching layers or CDN hit ratios because a cache miss doesn’t automatically become a line item that hurts. S3 , on the other hand, is a pricing maze: You pay for storage per GB-month. You pay per request (PUT/GET/LIST, etc.).…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More