Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
Post image 5
Post image 6
Post image 7
Post image 8
Post image 9
Post image 10
Post image 11
Post image 12
Post image 13
Post image 14
Post image 15
Post image 16
Post image 17
Post image 18
Post image 19
Post image 20
Post image 21
Post image 22
Post image 23
Post image 24
Post image 25
Post image 26
1 / 26
0

New publishing tool detects duplicate peer reviews in push against reviewer fraud

phys.org·Faye Holst·28 days ago
#Oh1EbNmP
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

IOPP's new Duplicate Review Checker. Credit: IOP Publishing IOP Publishing (IOPP) has developed a machine-learning powered tool to help detect duplicate peer review reports, addressing a growing threat to research integrity in scholarly publishing. Duplicate peer reviews (where the same reviewer report is sent for multiple submissions) are problematic because they fail to provide a unique and critical assessment of a manuscript, making the peer review unreliable. The most egregious examples of this are "review mills," organizations churning out fake reviews, often to inflate citations for a paying customer. Until now, such patterns in reviewer reports have been difficult to identify, limiting publishers' ability to take timely action. The Duplicate Review Checker (DRC) changes this by automatically flagging duplicate review activity immediately and directly to editorial teams, enabling early interventions to safeguard the integrity of peer review.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More