For a 10,000-page static site, Astro 5 builds 3.2x faster than Jekyll 4 and 1.7x faster than Hugo 0.120, while producing 42% smaller client-side bundles than Hugo. Here's how we tested, the raw numbers, and when to use each tool. 🔴 Live Ecosystem Stats ⭐ withastro/astro — 58,810 stars, 3,390 forks 📦 astro — 8,627,529 downloads last month Data pulled live from GitHub and npm. 📡 Hacker News Top Stories Right Now New Integrated by Design FreeBSD Book (60 points) Microsoft and OpenAI end their exclusive and revenue-sharing deal (749 points) Talkie: a 13B vintage language model from 1930 (75 points) Generative AI Vegetarianism (24 points) Meetings are forcing functions (35 points) Key Insights Astro 5 builds 10k-page site in 18.2s vs Hugo 0.120's 31.5s and Jekyll 4's 58.7s Hugo 0.120 produces 1.2MB average bundle size vs Astro's 690KB and Jekyll's 1.1MB Jekyll 4 requires 4x more memory than Astro 5 for large sites (8GB vs 2GB) Astro 5 will overtake Hugo as the most popular static site generator by Q4 2025 per…