Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
Post image 3
Post image 4
Post image 5
Post image 6
Post image 7
Post image 8
Post image 9
Post image 10
Post image 11
Post image 12
Post image 13
Post image 14
Post image 15
Post image 16
Post image 17
1 / 17
0

Security boundaries in agentic architectures

Vercel News·Malte Ubl·4 days ago
#NGlcD2sW
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Most agents today run generated code with full access to your secrets. As more agents adopt coding agent patterns, where they read filesystems, run shell commands, and generate code, they're becoming multi-component systems that each need a different level of trust. While most teams run all of these components in a single security context, because that's how the default tooling works, we recommend thinking about these security boundaries differently. Below we walk through: The actors in agentic systems Where security boundaries should go between them An architecture for running agent and generated code in separate contexts Link to heading All agents are starting to look like coding agents More agents are adopting the coding agent architecture. These agents read and write to a filesystem. They run bash, Python, or similar programs to explore their environment. And increasingly, agents generate code to solve particular problems.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More