Menu

Face Value: Why ‘Looksmaxxing’ Is More Than Mewing and Mirrors
📰
0

Face Value: Why ‘Looksmaxxing’ Is More Than Mewing and Mirrors

TIME·Fay Bound-Alberti·about 1 month ago
#ErZmsEBA
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Photo-Illustration by TIME (Source Images: Eric Robert—Sygma/Getty Images, Lion's Gate/Getty Images) Fay Bound-Alberti is a professor of history at King's College London and the author of "The Face: A Cultural History." May 2, 2026 11:00 AM CUT Young men in bathrooms and bedrooms fix themselves on a scale via social media communities . Then, they agonize over their appearance and devise “soft” and “hard” ways to improve it.  Welcome to the era of “looksmaxxing, " which has taken over the manosphere and is creating a new aesthetic vocabulary in the process.  Underpinning it is a purportedly “objective” scale of attractiveness, based on such traits as “facial harmony,” balance, symmetry, and sexual dimorphism, to rank people on a scale from zero to eight, with eight being the highest (aka, in looksmaxing parlance, a “Giga Chad”) and zero the lowest (or what the phenomenon terms “subhuman.”)  It doesn’t stop there; there are subcategories.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More