Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
1 / 2
0

Retrospective: We Ditched Jenkins and Saved 30% on CI Costs Using GitLab 17 and Pulumi 3.150 for 2026 Teams

DEV Community·ANKUSH CHOUDHARY JOHAL·25 days ago
#EjpcJRis
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Retrospective: We Ditched Jenkins and Saved 30% on CI Costs Using GitLab 17 and Pulumi 3.150 for 2026 Teams Our Jenkins Pain Points By late 2025, our engineering organization supporting 12 distributed product teams (the core of our 2026 planning cohort) was drowning in Jenkins maintenance. We ran 45 self-managed Jenkins controllers across 3 regions, with over 200 plugins to support legacy pipelines, static agent pools, and custom Groovy scripts. Key issues included: Idle agent waste: Static agent pools sat unused 40% of the time, driving up cloud compute costs Plugin hell: Conflicting plugin versions caused weekly outages, requiring 2 full-time engineers to maintain Pipeline portability: Jenkins pipelines were tied to our legacy on-prem controller, with no native support for hybrid cloud workloads we planned for 2026 Cost opacity: We couldn't attribute CI costs to individual teams, making it impossible to optimize spend Why GitLab 17 and Pulumi 3.150?…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More