Menu

Post image 1
Post image 2
1 / 2
0

The $16 Million Question: If Editing Harris Was ‘Election Interference,’ What Was Editing Trump?

Reading 0:00
15s threshold

from the remember-the-first-amendment? dept In late 2024, Donald Trump sued CBS for $10 billion claiming “election interference” because 60 Minutes had the audacity to (*gasp*) edit a Kamala Harris interview down for broadcast. The lawsuit was, on its face, ridiculous — editing interviews is protected First Amendment activity, the kind of editorial discretion that has been the entire premise of magazine-format television since the format existed. But CBS’s owners at Paramount needed FCC approval for their Skydance merger, and Trump controlled the FCC, so they paid $16 million to make the lawsuit go away. We covered that institutional cave at the time and called it what it was: a bribe dressed up as a legal settlement. Now here we are, in 2026, and 60 Minutes has done an interview with Trump that they edited down from 40 minutes to 13 . Sure enough, the editing made Trump sound way more coherent than he actually was.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.

Read More